Test 001. What does "in minutes" leave out of a submission packet?
Convr introduced DocData on 8 September 2026: upload a commercial submission packet, get a summary of operations, exposures and loss history "in minutes." The claim is a capability, not a number, so the test is not whether the summary is accurate. It is what the summary omits, and whether an omission is visible to the person relying on it.
- Test set
- Five authorized, redacted commercial packets, frozen before the run. Expected fields assigned by two reviewers, disagreements adjudicated by a third, all before anyone sees output.
- Denominator
- Every expected field, not only the fields the tool attempts. A blank counts as an error.
- Reported
- Field accuracy, document-level all-correct rate, silent omissions, unsupported values, and critical defects — anything that would change what a client believes is covered, what it costs, or who is insured — separately.
- Conditions
- Tool version, settings, retries, manual cleanup, document mix and scan quality, published with the result.
- Not claimed
- An error rate. Five packets demonstrate failure modes; they are not a sample a rate can be estimated from.
The vendor receives the packets, the field schema and the results before publication, with two questions: what does your accuracy figure count, and are human corrections included? The reply runs in full, or we note that none was received.